Introduction

Context-conscious programs stemming from numerous fields like cell health, recommender systems, and cell trade doubtlessly advantage from understanding components of the user’s character. As filling out character questionnaires is tedious, we recommend the prediction of the user’s character from phone sensor and utilization information. In order to gather information for studying the connection between phone information and character, we advanced the Android app TYDR (Track Your Daily Routine) which tracks smart-telecall smartphone information and makes use of psychometric character questionnaires.

With TYDR, we tune a bigger style of phone information than comparable current apps, along with metadata on notifications, pictures taken, and track performed returned through the user. For the improvement of TYDR, we introduce a well-known context information version including 4 classes that target the user’s one-of-a-kind kinds of interactions with the phone: bodily situations and activity, tool repute and utilization, center features utilization, and app utilization. On the pinnacle of this, we broaden the privateness version of PM-MoDaC particularly for apps associated with the gathering of cell information, including 9 proposed privateness measures. We gift the implementation of all of these measures in TYDR. Although the usage of the user’s character primarily based totally on using his or her phone is a hard endeavor, it appears to be a promising technique for diverse kinds of context-conscious cell packages.

Some References:

  1. Beierle, F., 2018. Do You Like What I Like? Similarity Estimation in Proximity-primarily based totally Mobile Social Networks, in Proc. 2018 seventeenth IEEE International Conference On Trust, Security And Privacy In Computing And Communications (TrustCom), IEEE (to appear).

2) Beierle, F., Göndör, S., Küpper, A., 2015. seventh International Workshop on Hot Topics in Planet-Scale mObile Computing and Online Social Networking (HotPOST), ACM. pp. 1–6. doi:10.1145/2757513.2757517.

3) Beierle, F., Grunert, K., Göndör, S., Küpper, A., 2016. Privacy-conscious Social Music Playlist Generation, in Proc. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), IEEE. pp. 5650–5656. doi:10.1109/ICC.2016.7511602.

4) Beierle, F., Grunert, K., Göndör, S., Schlüter, V., 2017. Towards Psychometrics-primarily based totally Friend Recommendations in Social Networking Services, in 2017 IEEE International Conference on AI & Mobile Services (AIMS), IEEE. pp. 105–108. doi:10.1109/AIMS.2017.22.

5) Android App for Tracking Smartphone Sensor and Usage Data, in 2018 ACM/IEEE Fifth International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems (MOBILESoft ‘18), ACM. pp. 72–75. doi:10.1145/3197231.3197235.

6) Bogomolov, A., Lepri, B., Ferron, M., Pianesi, F., Pentland, A.S., 2014. Daily Stress Recognition from Mobile Phone Data, Weather Conditions, and Individual Traits, in Proc. twenty-second ACM International Conference on Multimedia, ACM. pp. 477–486. doi:10.1145/2647868.2654933.

7) Butt, S., Phillips, J.G., 2008. Personality and self suggested cell use. Computers in Human Behavior 24, 346–360.

8) Canzian, L., Musolesi, M., 2015. Trajectories of Depression: Unobtrusive Monitoring of Depressive States through Means of Smartphone Mobility Traces Analysis, in Proc. of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp), ACM. pp. 1293–1304. doi:10.1145/2750858.2805845.

9) Chittaranjan, G., Blom, J., Gatica-Perez, D., 2011. Who’s Who with Big-Five: Analyzing and Classifying Personality Traits with Smartphones, in Proc. 2011 fifteenth Annual International Symposium on Wearable Computers, IEEE. pp. 29–36. doi:10.1109/ISWC.2011.29.

10) Chittaranjan G., Blom J., Gatica-Perez D. Mining large-scale phone information for character studies Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 17 (2013), pp. 433-450 doi:10.1007/s00779-011-0490-1.

11) Chorley M.J., Whitaker R.M., Allen S.M. Personality and location-primarily based totally social networks Computers in Human Behavior, 46 (2015), pp. 45-56

12) de Montjoye Y.A., Quoidbach J., Robic F., Pentland A. Predicting Personality Using Novel Mobile Phone-Based Metrics, SBP, Springer (2013), pp. 48-55 doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37210-0_6.

13) Dey A.K. Understanding and Using Context Personal Ubiquitous Comput., 5 (2001), pp. 4-7

doi:10.1007/s007790170019.

14) Ferreira, D., Kostakos, V., Dey, A.K., 2015. AWARE: Mobile Context Instrumentation Framework. Frontiers in ICT 2.

15) Fleeson W. Toward a Structure-and Process-Integrated View of Personality: Traits as Density Distributions of States

16) Grover, T., Mark, G., 2017. Digital Footprints: Predicting Personality from Temporal Patterns of Technology Use, in Proc. 2017 ACM Intl. Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proc. 2017 ACM Intl. Symposium on Wearable Computers, ACM. pp. 41–44.

17) Harari G.M., Müller S.R., Aung M.S., Rentfrow P.J. Smartphone sensing strategies for reading conduct in regular life Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 18 (2017), pp. 83-90 doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.07.018. ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar

18) 14th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, ACM. pp. 1–15. doi:10.1145/2906388.2906400.

19) Karumur, R.P., Nguyen, T.T., Konstan, J.A., 2017. Personality, User Preferences and Behavior in Recommender systems. Information Systems Frontiers, 1–25. doi:10.1007/s10796-017-9800-0.

20) Towards wealthy cell telecell smartphone datasets: Lausanne information collection campaign, in Proc. ACM Intl. Conf. on Pervasive Computing (ICPS).